Re: Next steps [Was Re: Flattened relationship support]

From: Andrus (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Sun Nov 17 2002 - 18:26:19 EST

  • Next message: Andrus: "Re: DataContext.registerNewObject() vs. entityResolver"

    At 02:04 PM 11/17/2002 +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
    >Craig Miskell wrote:
    > > I'd like to see an eclipse modeller plugin, with class generation tied
    > > directly into an eclipse project. But that's just me, and I don't have
    >
    >nope :-)
    >One of my first thoughts after I saw the MVCification of the Modeler.
    >
    > > the resources to do it just yet. (Cant' justify it during work time, and
    > > my machine at home struggles along just running eclipse, let alone running
    > > an embedded eclipse for debugging a plugin :-( )

    This whole IDE issue made me totally upset just a few weeks ago. On the one
    hand we needed to evolve it and make it more powerful, on the other hand
    continued development in Swing felt like a dead end. Finally I figured we
    have no choice but continue with Swing. So I started the MVC effort for the
    new screens and dialogs. In short, it is a bit messy now.

    As for switching to Eclipse, history shows that there must be a person
    dedicated exclusively to the plugin development for this to happen. This is
    how it happened in WOProject/WOLips (thanks to Ulrich), same thing is true
    with Tapestry. Eclipse GUI development looks like a big piece to bite when
    also working on the core Cayenne code :-(.

    I think we can't abandon Swing Modeler until someone expresses the desire
    to lead an Eclipse project and moves at least to a point when you can do
    complete model editing. As for Holger's concerns about quickly changing
    versions of Cayenne and Eclipse, I suspect this is always going to happen
    in one form or another.

    Andrus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Nov 17 2002 - 18:25:32 EST