Re: Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState

From: Craig Miskell (cmiskel..lbatross.co.nz)
Date: Mon Nov 25 2002 - 14:07:20 EST

Next message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState"

Previous message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Tip: using jikes without modifying ant scripts"
In reply to: Holger Hoffstätte: "Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState"
Next in thread: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 04:23, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>
> Suggestion:
>
> - deprecate & move persistenceStateSting() out of DataObject into
> PersistenceState
+1

> - turn PersistenceState into a class instead of interface since there are
> no implementors anyway (it's just a place to keep the int symbols)
Sounds reasonable to me, but I'm wondering if Andrus had any particular
reason for doing it as an interface in the first place (or maybe it's
just a hangover from a previous idea).

Craig

Next message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState"
Previous message: Holger Hoffstätte: "Tip: using jikes without modifying ant scripts"
In reply to: Holger Hoffstätte: "Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState"
Next in thread: Holger Hoffstätte: "Re: Suggested cleanup: DataObject/PersistenceState"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 25 2002 - 14:06:22 EST