+1
We should probably start doing this for Cayenne itself too. Right now it
has a version label in each JAR MANIFEST.MF, but who looks at those :-).
The only reason NOT to do it is to make it easy on people who use CLASSPATH
explicitly.
Andrus
At 04:55 AM 12/1/2002 +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>I was hacking away when I suddenly noticed (among othher things) that the
>distributed commons-collections.jar was still at version 2.0 instead of
>the current 2.1 - this got me thinking: some of the jars have version
>numbers, some do not. So I fixed up everything to have version numbers,
>updated the jars to their most recent versions ('stable') and also cleaned
>up the ant scripts to have no more hardcoded directory/jar file names;
>they consistently use variables now.
>All this is building & running the tests correctly on both Windows and
>Linux, so unless anybody thinks this is a Bad Idea I'd like to check this
>in, tomorrow or on Monday.
>
>Btw, the ant scripts are very readable - it's pretty easy to figure out
>what is going on where and in which order. Good work Andrus!
>
>-h
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 21:07:55 EST