> > > That's another possibility and probably less intrusive, only (?)
> > > affected methods would be loadDataMapFromDB() and its caller
> > > ImportDbAction.loadMap().
> > > No idea what would be better..maybe Craig or Andriy?
> >
> > I'd like to hear other opinions too...
> In that case, I shall opine:
>
> I think that a DataMap per schema seems reasonable to me. If you
> connect as a normal user, you'll only get the schema(s?) you can see.
> If you connect as DBA or more privileged user, you should be able to
> reverse engineer all the schemas visible, but they obviously need to be
> separated. And a DataMap/schema "works" conceptually...at least for me
> anyway :-)
>
> Craig
>
My vote is for a DataMap per schema too. The mapping will be very natural.
Andriy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 11:56:04 EST