>> Dirk sent me a nice diff that applied flawlessly against HEAD (thanks!
>> :-); it doesn't seem to break anything in particular, should I check
>> this
>> in?
>
> Please do it!
Ok, just for everyone who's trying to run the testsuite: there are
still 2 Failures which I'd like to discuss in separate mails. I could
have fixed them the easy way but I'd like to get deeper into the
background before making a fix.
> Just curious, were there any DbAdapter re-architecture involved, or
> was it sufficient to implement the current API in PostgeSQL-friendly
> fashion?
As Holger said: just implement a few hooks, that's all. Note that the
adaptor uses (for now) the AUTO_PK_TABLE for PK generation, although
PostgreSQL can do sequences. I've had a look at the OraclePkGenerator
and it seems that the bulk of that code could be reused for the
PostgresPkGenerator that uses Sequences.
So I'd like to split the Oracle PK generator to an abstract
SequencePkGenerator class that both OraclePkGenerator and
PostgresPkGenerator can extend. I can come up with a proposal if we
decide to go that way.
-dirk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Feb 09 2003 - 22:07:28 EST