Re: CVS migration to apache??

From: Cris Daniluk (cris.danilu..mail.com)
Date: Fri May 05 2006 - 13:47:06 EDT

Next message: JIRA: "[JIRA] Created: (CAY-543) MSAccess adapter does not support paged queries"

Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "CVS migration to apache??"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "CVS migration to apache??"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Do not check in code until further notice"
Reply: Andrus Adamchik: "Do not check in code until further notice"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like crazy.

I'm definitely +1

On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Anonymous CVS..F has been down since March. A number of users have
> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their custom
> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
> rather annoying.
>
> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep 1.2
> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep doing
> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
>
> Andrus
>

Next message: JIRA: "[JIRA] Created: (CAY-543) MSAccess adapter does not support paged queries"
Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "CVS migration to apache??"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "CVS migration to apache??"
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Do not check in code until further notice"
Reply: Andrus Adamchik: "Do not check in code until further notice"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri May 05 2006 - 13:47:32 EDT