JIRA->SVN links (Re: [DONE] Re: Do not check in code until further notice)

From: Jeff Turner (jeff..pache.org)
Date: Sun May 07 2006 - 20:49:02 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: JIRA->SVN links (Re: [DONE] Re: Do not check in code until further notice)"

    On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > Migration is successfully completed. Check ins can resume to the new
    > location at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/
    > trunk/cayenne/

    I've enabled the JIRA Subversion integration. Eg:

    http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-261?page=all
    http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-470?page=all
    http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-207?page=all

    There are plenty of examples, as Andrus has been very good about
    recording issue keys in commits.

    --Jeff

    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > On May 6, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    > > I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
    > >
    > > As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the
    > > HEAD code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta
    > > tag - no big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS
    > > - it worked pretty well.
    > >
    > > Andrus
    > >
    > >
    > > On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
    > >
    > >> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
    > >> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
    > >> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like crazy.
    > >>
    > >> I'm definitely +1
    > >>
    > >> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > >>> Anonymous CVS..F has been down since March. A number of users have
    > >>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their custom
    > >>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
    > >>> rather annoying.
    > >>>
    > >>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep
    > >>> 1.2
    > >>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep doing
    > >>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
    > >>>
    > >>> Andrus
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >
    > >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun May 07 2006 - 20:49:26 EDT