That's what I was wondering too. In our case the projects are
isolated from the rest of the code, so sandbox would be a preferred
approach. Cayenne project committers do not have the infrastructure
karma, so we will have to bother somebody else to set this up.
Alternatively I can setup an SVN sandbox on ObjectStyle.org (and I
can manage sandboxes for all other willing SoC apache projects as
well) ... not sure if that's a bad idea from Cayenne incubating
perspective (as we are moving the infrastructure from ObjectStyle to
Apache), but it makes sense from practical standpoint and takes some
load from the Infra.
Any comments on that?
Andrus
On May 22, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> How you manage your students is entirely up to you. Some people
> created a sandbox area in SVN, together with a temporary ASF
> account to access it. Others expected their students to go through
> the normal meritocracy process of earning commit priveledges.
>
> Bear in mind, that this whole process increases the load on the
> infrastructure team. It is worth ensuring the student knows how to
> submit patches via your issue tracker even if you intend to create
> a sandbox. That way you don't have to wait for the infra team to
> find the time.
>
> Ross
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 24 2006 - 12:45:08 EDT