Yes CAY-400 would be very useful, especially if we can take it down to
a field level. Examples could include:
* database table and field comments
* field metadata, e.g. minvalue="5", label="Customer No."
I will take this up dicussion further on the JIRA
regards Malcolm
On 10/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Actually if all you need is to attach arbitrary properties to the
> mapping objects, I suggest that we work on this Jira issue:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-400
>
> adding this functionality to the Modeler itself. It is fairly
> straightforward and is long overdue - it was promised to the users
> quite some time ago.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > Hi Malcolm,
> >
> > DVModeler is available up to and including 2.0.x release.
> >
> > We removed it from the trunk recently, because there are no
> > volunteers to support it, and it hasn't been updated for many years
> > now, becoming a liability. We can always resurrect it if somebody
> > steps in and dedicates enough time to this piece of technology.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I wanted to enquire about the status of the Cayenne DataView
> >> modeller.
> >>
> >> The reason being we are looking at defining related UI metadata for
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> regards Malcolm Edgar
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Oct 09 2006 - 01:17:40 EDT