Is the DataView design compatible with the JPA direction of Cayenne,
i.e. will the *.map.xml file become obsolete?
regards Malcolm
On 10/9/06, Malcolm Edgar <malcolm.edga..mail.com> wrote:
> Yes CAY-400 would be very useful, especially if we can take it down to
> a field level. Examples could include:
> * database table and field comments
> * field metadata, e.g. minvalue="5", label="Customer No."
>
> I will take this up dicussion further on the JIRA
>
> regards Malcolm
>
> On 10/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> > Actually if all you need is to attach arbitrary properties to the
> > mapping objects, I suggest that we work on this Jira issue:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-400
> >
> > adding this functionality to the Modeler itself. It is fairly
> > straightforward and is long overdue - it was promised to the users
> > quite some time ago.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Malcolm,
> > >
> > > DVModeler is available up to and including 2.0.x release.
> > >
> > > We removed it from the trunk recently, because there are no
> > > volunteers to support it, and it hasn't been updated for many years
> > > now, becoming a liability. We can always resurrect it if somebody
> > > steps in and dedicates enough time to this piece of technology.
> > >
> > > Andrus
> > >
> > >
> > > On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> I wanted to enquire about the status of the Cayenne DataView
> > >> modeller.
> > >>
> > >> The reason being we are looking at defining related UI metadata for
> > >> applications.
> > >>
> > >> regards Malcolm Edgar
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Oct 09 2006 - 05:09:38 EDT