Bill Dudney wrote:
> I think we are ripe, we've not heard anything from Jean so I think we
> should move the discussion to the ppmc.
It looks like all the work items are done at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html .
So I agree.
> Once we get agreement there we can bring it back here and vote and then
> go to the incubator.
Since the DB PMC is sponsoring Cayenne, I suggest first checking in with
them.
To be honest, I'm not sure of the procedure at this point. No doubt
there are precedents in genera..ncubator.apache.org that could be dug up.
-jean
> Thoughts?
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> On Oct 5, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> I just updated our incubator status page, and we are looking really
>> good:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
>>
>> Here is a short summary of our incubation progress:
>>
>> * we came in to the incubator this March as an open source project
>> with strong existing meritocracy procedures and extensive code base
>> * we migrated 100% of the infrastructure to Apache
>> * we collected all CLA's (and rewrote those few pieces of code where
>> we couldn't find the authors)
>> * and finally we made a 2.0.1 release that sailed smoothly through
>> the approval process
>>
>> Looks like Apache Cayenne is ripe for graduation. I think the
>> original intent to graduate as an Apache Top Level Project (TLP) is
>> still the best thing to do.
>>
>> Thoughts on how do we proceed with graduation?
>>
>> Andrus
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Oct 27 2006 - 12:37:48 EDT