"FindBugs" names seems to imply too much for an automated tool :-)
Can you post a report somewhere showing what kind of "bugs" it finds?
Andrus
On Feb 1, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> What would the general consensus be here of using FindBugs
> (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/)? I just used the 1.1.1 version to
> analyze Cayenne 3.0 and it is reporting 1720 (potential) bugs (at
> least on my current source tree). I haven't used this tool much yet,
> but it seems like it could be useful. I also believe it has support
> to run in the background, like from an ant task. This could be useful
> for nightly builds. Or even like a weekly report of some kind.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> /dev/mrg
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 01 2007 - 08:59:36 EST