Re: FindBugs

From: Michael Gentry (blacknex..mail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2007 - 09:06:32 EST

  • Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: FindBugs"

    Well, it has GUI and command-line (which can be automated) support.
    I'm kind of in the mood to play with it today, so I'll try to put
    together something. I've been running it (GUI-mode) against some of
    the Java stuff around here and it is finding "interesting" things.
    :-)

    Thanks,

    /dev/mrg

    On 2/1/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > "FindBugs" names seems to imply too much for an automated tool :-)
    >
    > Can you post a report somewhere showing what kind of "bugs" it finds?
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    > On Feb 1, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >
    > > What would the general consensus be here of using FindBugs
    > > (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/)? I just used the 1.1.1 version to
    > > analyze Cayenne 3.0 and it is reporting 1720 (potential) bugs (at
    > > least on my current source tree). I haven't used this tool much yet,
    > > but it seems like it could be useful. I also believe it has support
    > > to run in the background, like from an ant task. This could be useful
    > > for nightly builds. Or even like a weekly report of some kind.
    > >
    > > Thoughts?
    > >
    > > Thanks!
    > >
    > > /dev/mrg
    > >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 01 2007 - 09:06:57 EST