I'm pretty lazy right now (as in other things occupying time), but it
sounds like a good idea -- especially if it can help generate the
release notes. So, I'd say +1 especially if the pulldown list doesn't
get all cluttered with the "archived" versions.
/dev/mrg
On 2/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Sure, lets wait for another day or two to establish lazy consensus.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
> > Should we wait for others to chime in before making the change?
> >
> > --
> > Kevin
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:06 PM
> >> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
> >>
> >> Even better :-)
> >>
> >> I just added your id to Cayenne project admins in Jira. Let
> >> me know if this wasn't enough to edit the versions.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think once you "archive" a version it's no longer
> >> selectable in any
> >>> of the issue filings. For instance, we'd probably archive
> >> 1.2, 1.2.1,
> >>> 2.0, and 2.0.1, so they could not be selected as "affects" or "fix
> >>> version".
> >>> Bugs would then be logged against 1.2.2 and 2.0.2, with 1.2.3 and
> >>> 2.0.3
> >>> available as fix versions. Versions that are archived still retain
> >>> their changelogs though. So, I think that would address
> >> your concern.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure how far back that feature goes, though, and if it's
> >>> available in the version the ASF runs. A JIRA admin would have to
> >>> look into that.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kevin
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:56 PM
> >>>> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: JIRA changelog & roadmap
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> The downside is that we'll have a very long list of versions, with
> >>>> higher probability of making a mistake when picking one.
> >>>> But the upside (at least I hope) will be that the
> >> RELEASE-NOTES can
> >>>> be generated straight from Jira, regardless how many versions a
> >>>> particular fix affected (currently the RELEASE-NOTES.txt is built
> >>>> manually).
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 15 2007 - 09:20:48 EST