This takes us back to the Modeler plugins discussion. If we have a
plugin environment in place, third party plugins will not have any
licensing restrictions (kind of like Maven, hehe)
Andrus
On Feb 26, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> We'll have to do a "complicated license talk" with the ASF no matter
> what happens unless the published license of the code appears in the
> list of approved ASF licenses.
>
> And anything that does not fall under "Category A: Authorized
> Licenses" will be difficult to integrate.
> http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#category-a
>
> GPL falls under "Category X: Excluded Licenses"
>
> On 2/25/07, Adrian Wiesmann <awiesman..omap.org> wrote:
>> > The license appears to be the Open Software License despite the
>> > commentary at the top of the page. We'd have to run this
>> license by
>> > legal-discuss before we could use it as it has not yet been
>> classified
>> > by the ASF yet.
>>
>> I asked Francisco if he would mind if I redistribute parts of his
>> code
>> under the GPLv2. This was no problem for him. I'd first contact
>> Francisco
>> before doing some complicated licence talk with the ASF.
>>
>> But first of all it would be required that everybody is OK with
>> adding
>> some (this) diagram editor to Cayenne. My earlier mail was just a
>> suggestion. Please first have a look at alternatives and at the
>> source/implementation in question...
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Feb 26 2007 - 05:15:29 EST