> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 5:40 AM
> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Documenting the modules / Documenting the sets
> of functionality
> > Ugh. I really wish you'd named it differently, then. Like
> > maven-cayenne-cgen-plugin. I'm guessing it might ahve
> more than cgen
> > in it, but still, this module name looks like more maven
> > infrastructure as it stands.
> This is a *user* published module. Cayenne users will only
> see this single module. So it makes sense to call it
The intention is to pack more into than just cgen. I'm thinking of a
mojo for cgen, cdbgen, and even a way to fire up the modeler from within
maven (e.g., 'mvn cayenne:modeler'). Of course, I haven't had as much
time to do this as I'd like. The almost complete lack of documentation
about the plugin architecture and maven's use of classworlds hasn't
helped matters either.
In any event, I think the name as it stands now is most appropriate.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Mar 03 2007 - 23:27:44 EST