+1, I like this format, but see comments below.
> * A member of the Apache Geronimo has started some work on
> integration between the two projects.
There were multiple people involved from both communities, some are
Geronimo committers, some - Cayenne, some - neither. So I'd say we
rephrase it - "First attempts were made by Cayenne and Geronimo
communities to integrate Cayenne JPA provider in Geronimo".
> We have only some minor issues with Confluence still to resolve,
> but otherwise everything is working well.
Which one is that?
Andrus
On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 12/03/2007, at 9:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Not sure what we can report this month that is of the significance
>> to the Board, although lots of development work has been done.
>
> Looking through some other reports [1] something like this might be
> appropriate:
>
>
> -----------------
> Issues requiring the Board's attention: none.
>
>
> Infrastructure
> --------------
> We'd like to thank the ASF Infrastructure team for the painless
> transition to TLP. We have only some minor issues with Confluence
> still to resolve, but otherwise everything is working well.
>
>
> Development
> -----------
> * Cayenne continues to make good progress towards its goal of JPA
> compliance with the 3.0 release.
> * A member of the Apache Geronimo has started some work on
> integration between the two projects.
> * Snapshots from the 3.0 branch are now being made available as
> precompiled binaries to enhance wider testing of the new features.
>
>
> Community
> ---------
> No real changes here, although the mailing lists have been busier
> than usual.
>
> -----------------
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2006/
> board_minutes_2006_12_20.txt
>
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> phone +61 2 9660 9700
> PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Mar 12 2007 - 07:27:19 EDT