I've been too busy (work and personal) to check out the release artifacts,
which is why I haven't chimed in. I *could* just add an obligatory +1, but
that doesn't feel right and I was hoping others had more time to do abetter
checkout. The only thing I noticed when I took a very quick cursory look is
that the 1.2.3 release Tore put together doesn't have checksum files, but I
consider this a non-issue.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 5/10/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> Talking of which - we need one more vote from a PMC member. Any of
> the remaining members have time to check the release and vote?
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 10, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> > IMO you are correct - only PMC member votes are binding. But there
> > are two things to note in this respect: (1) input from committers
> > is always taken into account - I don't think there's been instances
> > when we ignored such input on matters requiring a vote; (2) PMC is
> > not some elite caste - IMO we should expand/contract it as needed
> > to include people who contribute to the project and to the
> > community. And in fact I am planning to act on item (2).
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On May 10, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> >> Hmm . . . I just reviewed the voting procedure and noticed that
> >> technically my +1 is non-binding. Do we make the distinction between
> >> PMC members and committers for project releases?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Kevin Menard
> >>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:32 PM
> >>> To: 'de..ayenne.apache.org'
> >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Cayenne 1.2.3 and 2.0.3
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> FYI, I was involved in the release process and tested 2.0.3
> >>> against HSQLDB, Derby, PostgreSQL 8.2, and MySQL 5. All
> >>> worked for me.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kevin
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu May 10 2007 - 11:44:22 EDT