Re: How about 3.0 M1?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Jun 25 2007 - 09:05:05 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "RE: How about 3.0 M1?"

    Not yet.

    On Jun 23, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote:

    > Does the "JPA-inspiried classic features" include expanded mapping
    > of relationships? In particular, does it currently include the
    > notion of mapping a to-many relationship as a map, instead of a
    > list? :)
    >
    > Robert
    >
    > On Jun 22, 2007, at 6/224:01 PM , Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> On Jun 22, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>
    >>> I'm not really opposed, but I haven't looked much at the JPA stuff.
    >>
    >> This release is definitely alpha. While one can do real
    >> persistence with Cayenne JPA already, we do not claim any kind of
    >> completeness. Still good to have new JPA-inspired classic features
    >> out there (such as lifecycle callbacks), as we'll get user
    >> feedback and better chance of finding the bugs early.
    >>
    >>> However, do we still have an unresolved issue with the password
    >>> encoding? I
    >>> tried to subscribe to the Apache Legal mailing list several times
    >>> and never
    >>> got added, so I could never take the question over there.
    >>
    >> Hmm... not sure whom we ping to get this resolved... One thing to
    >> check - have you used your apache.org email? This may speed up
    >> subscription moderation.
    >>
    >>> PS. I'd advertise the new JPA/etc stuff as alpha-quality, but
    >>> emphasis the
    >>> Cayenne Classic stuff is stable.
    >>
    >> Yep, that's the plan.
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 25 2007 - 09:05:30 EDT