RE: How about 3.0 M1?

From: Kevin Menard (kmenar..ervprise.com)
Date: Mon Jun 25 2007 - 12:41:38 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: How about 3.0 M1?"

    I'm for it. I've been out of the 3.0 game for a little bit, but it
    seemed pretty stable the last time I tried it. It'd be helpful to get
    other people using it, too. Early adopters can provide plenty of JIRA
    goodness.

    -- 
    Kevin 
    

    > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:24 AM > To: de..ayenne.apache.org > Subject: How about 3.0 M1? > > What's the consensus on making 3.0 M1 release? > > I think it is long overdue - we want to show the many things > we've developed over the last 1+ year [1]. Also I just > checked in the minimal EJBQL support so that users can play > with it (that was my own minimal TODO). As before "M" > (milestone) means an alpha quality release with unstable new > features, "unstable" indicating that the new API can change > over the course of the release. > > If nobody objects to going forward with M1, I will switch in > the release preparation mode, testing the code across > different databases, writing the docs, etc. > > Andrus > > > [1] http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/guide-to-30-features.html >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 25 2007 - 12:42:06 EDT