Re: How about 3.0 M1?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Jun 25 2007 - 12:51:47 EDT

  • Next message: Tore Halset: "Re: How about 3.0 M1?"

    Cool.

    I am very much into "release often release early" philosophy, and I'd
    like to start following it with 3.0 on both counts.

    BTW, I just fixed a few remaining EJBQL join bugs that I found, so
    now I will fully concentrate on cross-DB testing and the docs.

    Andrus

    On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
    > I'm for it. I've been out of the 3.0 game for a little bit, but it
    > seemed pretty stable the last time I tried it. It'd be helpful to get
    > other people using it, too. Early adopters can provide plenty of JIRA
    > goodness.
    >
    > --
    > Kevin
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
    >> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:24 AM
    >> To: de..ayenne.apache.org
    >> Subject: How about 3.0 M1?
    >>
    >> What's the consensus on making 3.0 M1 release?
    >>
    >> I think it is long overdue - we want to show the many things
    >> we've developed over the last 1+ year [1]. Also I just
    >> checked in the minimal EJBQL support so that users can play
    >> with it (that was my own minimal TODO). As before "M"
    >> (milestone) means an alpha quality release with unstable new
    >> features, "unstable" indicating that the new API can change
    >> over the course of the release.
    >>
    >> If nobody objects to going forward with M1, I will switch in
    >> the release preparation mode, testing the code across
    >> different databases, writing the docs, etc.
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >>
    >> [1] http://cayenne.apache.org/doc/guide-to-30-features.html
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jun 25 2007 - 12:52:12 EDT