On 10/21/07 4:20 PM, "Lachlan Deck" <lachlan.dec..mail.com> wrote:
>
> If this is something you'd prefer to do, Kevin, then I'd suggest
> adjusting your velocity templates to achieve what you'd like for the
> varying setter methods and so on. This is the usual place to do any
> such abstractions.
Certainly, that's doable. As is what Ari had suggested. The question is
should there be a better "default". If it is common practice for end users
to roll similar abstractions, that seems to be indicative of there needing
to be a better default. Unfortunately, that's a difficult thing to
ascertain.
-- Kevin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Oct 21 2007 - 16:25:19 EDT