Actually, I hadn't thought of that. But, given that Java6 introduced new
javax.sql API methods, that could very well be the case.
Should 1.4's code just merge over to 1.5 then?
-- KevinOn 10/24/07 3:39 AM, "Andrus Adamchik" <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> I think no - somehow I feel there will be "cayenne-jdk1.6- > unpublished" in a not so distant future. > > Andrus > > > On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > >> >> On 24/10/2007, at 2:15 AM, Kevin Menard wrote: >> >>> It's to differentiate between assemblies that are published as >>> JARs and >>> those that are used simply to build larger assemblies that are >>> published as >>> JARs. >> >> Now that 1.4 and 1.5 are being merged, do we want to rename that >> project cayenne-core?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 24 2007 - 08:09:27 EDT