Re: Why the "unpublished" suffix?

From: Aristedes Maniatis (ar..aniatis.org)
Date: Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:53:14 EDT

  • Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "XMLSerializable"

    It might still be easier to have cayenne-core and cayenne-jdk1.[x+1]
    at all times. That avoids us having to move 99% of the code to a new
    project and update all the maven paths, plus all the Confluence docs
    every time a JDK update is required.

    Although I guess with the right svn commands the history of all the
    files will be preserved however we move things around, so it
    shouldn't matter too much.

    Ari

    On 24/10/2007, at 5:39 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

    > I think no - somehow I feel there will be "cayenne-jdk1.6-
    > unpublished" in a not so distant future.
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    > On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> On 24/10/2007, at 2:15 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
    >>
    >>> It's to differentiate between assemblies that are published as
    >>> JARs and
    >>> those that are used simply to build larger assemblies that are
    >>> published as
    >>> JARs.
    >>
    >> Now that 1.4 and 1.5 are being merged, do we want to rename that
    >> project cayenne-core?
    >>
    >> Ari
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> -------------------------->
    >> Aristedes Maniatis
    >> phone +61 2 9660 9700
    >> PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >

    -------------------------->
    Aristedes Maniatis
    phone +61 2 9660 9700
    PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Nov 03 2007 - 21:53:52 EDT