Re: generics and ObjectContext

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2007 - 14:11:58 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: generics and ObjectContext"

    On Nov 20, 2007, at 8:39 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:

    > Generally I like the idea. The fewer casts I have to make in my code
    > afterward, the happier I am. Although, as is, I can make an unchecked
    > assignment and forego the cast anyway.

    > I think you'll run into issues with a few other queries as well,
    > such as
    > NamedQuery and ObjectIdQuery. I guess you could require a new class
    > parameter for them, but it wouldn't be backward compatible.
    > Likewise, you
    > could force a cast if they're used anonymously, but it's the same
    > problem
    > you're trying to fix, just in a different place.

    I guess any query that does not take a class (SelectQuery may also be
    entity-name based) would be Query<?>, resulting in List<?> returned.

    Andrus



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Nov 20 2007 - 14:12:33 EST