Re: [M3 issue] extended type on ROP

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2008 - 10:06:42 EST

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [M3 issue] extended type on ROP"

    Yes, this is packaging, as we filter out the entire "access" package
    and subpackages. But why would you want an ExtendedType on the client?

    Andrus

    On Jan 21, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

    > There might be a packaging problem.
    > org.apache.cayenne.access.types.ExtendedType is not in the client
    > ROP jar, but it will be required on the client for any attributes
    > which implement an extended type. It isn't used directly on the
    > client, so maybe some sort of stub would do the trick?
    >
    > Ari
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > -------------------------->
    > ish
    > http://www.ish.com.au
    > Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
    > phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
    > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Jan 21 2008 - 10:07:17 EST