Re: ExtendedEnumeration comments

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2008 - 13:18:01 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [jira] Commented: (CAY-1009) Bogus runtime relationships can mess up commit."

    I am not necessarily disagreeing with you. I am just viewing the
    documentation flow differently. To me "basic" comes before "extended".

    Andrus

    On Mar 14, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

    > That's exactly what I meant by a more orderly world ... :-)
    >
    > Everything I work on seems to be maintenance/enhancement of legacy
    > systems.
    >
    > I don't mind swapping the order they appear in the docs, but I still
    > think the extended ones are more reliable and flexible. I tried to
    > point out the shortcomings of the standard approach -- I just don't
    > want anyone getting burned by the integer issue with them.
    >
    > /dev/mrg
    >
    >
    > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik
    > <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >> I am lucky to have fewer (if any) legacy systems to deal with in the
    >> last 3 years.
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>> That just tells me you live in a more orderly world than I do. :-)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik
    >>> <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>> I still think it is logical to start with "Standard" and then
    >>>> move to
    >>>> "Extended", but otherwise looks great.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>> Andrus
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On Mar 14, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> I moved the enumeration documentation to here:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAYDOC/Modeling+Object
    >>>>> +Layer
    >>>>>
    >>>>> And deleted it off the Extended Types page. Let me know if that's
    >>>>> what you were thinking.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I also checked in the other changes to the code, so I think this
    >>>>> can
    >>>>> close out CAY-994 unless you think of anything else that should be
    >>>>> done for it right away.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thanks!
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 14 2008 - 13:18:33 EDT