[jira] Commented: (CAY-1009) Bogus runtime relationships can mess up commit.

From: Kevin Menard (JIRA) ("Kevin)
Date: Sun Mar 16 2008 - 11:10:38 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: Summer of Code"

        [ https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788#action_12788 ]

    Kevin Menard commented on CAY-1009:
    -----------------------------------

    Replacing the aforementioned check with

    if (target.isSubentityOf((ObjEntity) rel.getTargetEntity()))

    seems to take care of the issue. I have some local test failues in the CAY_207Test, however, that are confounding the issue a little bit.

    If the above check does work, we'll probably want to move it down a bit since it could be a costly operation and is likely to be the exception rather than the rule.

    > Bogus runtime relationships can mess up commit.
    > -----------------------------------------------
    >
    > Key: CAY-1009
    > URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1009
    > Project: Cayenne
    > Issue Type: Bug
    > Components: Cayenne Core Library
    > Affects Versions: 3.0
    > Reporter: Kevin Menard
    > Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
    >
    > I'm still the process of investigating this one, so more details to come. Basically what I'm seeing is that if two ObjRels map to the same DbRel somehow and only one is mapped explicitly, the runtime one can fail validation while the specified one passes. I'm observing this in a relationship that involves inheritance. It looks like I've explicitly mapped an ObjRel for the subclass type and Cayenne is creating one for the base class. The DbAttr is marked as required. Since I never specify a value in the runtime relationship, since it's not mapped or useful to me, validation fails. If I don't mark the attribute as mandatory, everything commits just fine. So, I suspect Cayenne resolves the conflict somewhere down the line.

    -- 
    This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
    -
    You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Mar 16 2008 - 11:12:21 EDT