Re: M4?

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2008 - 14:55:59 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: M4?"

    There is still no write SVN access, so we can't tag the release and
    will have to wait. There was a RAID failure and now while the
    replacement machine is being setup, all access is read-only.

    And as it often happens, I started on a big new development on the eve
    of the release (CAY-929, CAY-560). And I honestly didn't mean to
    include that in M4 (i.e. the plan was to wait with this commit till
    after we tag the release)... But if I finish it during the SVN
    downtime, we might as well put it in the release.

    CAY-929 (the modern join syntax for SelectQuery) is already finished
    and now I am adding the OUTER join semantics to expressions. I am not
    used to keep so many unrelated changes uncommitted and without
    multiple clear rollback points, but I guess I'll survive it that time...

    Andrus

    On Apr 24, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

    > +1 to M4. I'll be happy to help with putting the release together.
    >
    >
    > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tore Halset <halse..vv.ntnu.no>
    > wrote:
    >> Agree. I will be able to join in after 2000 CET or 1800 UTC almost
    >> every
    >> day.
    >>
    >> - Tore.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 23. april. 2008, at 09.35, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>> I think M4 is long overdue. Just these two issues warrant a
    >>> release -
    >> CAY-984, CAY-999, and we have so much more. I still hope to squeeze
    >> a few
    >> more bug fixes in it, but I feel like we need to release the next
    >> milestone
    >> rather sooner than later.
    >>>
    >>> Andrus
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 28 2008 - 14:57:03 EDT