So.. who's going to post the artifacts? (I can do it if needed)
Andrus
On May 28, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I agree. We have the necessary votes and have exceeded the 72 hour
> limit. We also left it open over a weekend for everyone to play
> with. I'd say the vote passed and we can proceed with the 3.0 M4
> release.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> On May 27, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> I never got to test the actual artifacts, but others did without
>> major
>> issues. I've mainly been using the trunk successfully. Given those
>> two items, I'm also +1 for the M4 release and agree it is time to
>> close the vote.
>>
>> /dev/mrg
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org
>> > wrote:
>>> So... looks like the time to close the vote?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> On May 18, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3.0M4 has been a long time coming. We've got a lot of new
>>>> features and
>>>> important bug fixes added. I've prepared assemblies for Windows,
>>>> Mac, and
>>>> others here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M4/
>>>>
>>>> Please test them out and vote for the release accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Here's my +1 for the release.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kevin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 28 2008 - 12:04:47 EDT