In this case method redundancy in the interface is benign enough (from
the POV of proxying and nesting of contexts), so maybe that's ok.
Andrus
On Jun 4, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I advocate this being applied to ObjectContext rather than
> DataContext. deleteObjects doesn't exist in ObjectContext, which is
> really quite annoying for the client. I'd hate to see further
> disparity.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik (JIRA) wrote:
>
>>
>> [ https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906
>> #action_12906 ]
>>
>> Andrus Adamchik commented on CAY-1065:
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> A few notes:
>>
>> 1. void registerNewObjects(List objects) -> void
>> registerNewObjects(Collection objects)
>>
>> 2. void registerNewObjects(Object[] objects) - no specific
>> objections, but if we do that, than to preserve some symmetry, we
>> need to provide a similar method for deleteObjects,
>> unregsiterObjects, etc. Maybe that's ok... Currently I have no
>> opinion... Also check out Java 5 vararg notation: void
>> registerNewObjects(Object... objects)
>>
>>
>>
>>> Add registerNewObjects() method to DataContext
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Key: CAY-1065
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-1065
>>> Project: Cayenne
>>> Issue Type: New Feature
>>> Components: Cayenne Core Library
>>> Affects Versions: 3.0
>>> Environment: N/A
>>> Reporter: Michael Gentry
>>> Assignee: Michael Gentry
>>> Priority: Minor
>>> Fix For: 3.0
>>>
>>>
>>> Add registerNewObjects() method to DataContext which is a cover
>>> method which calls registerNewObject(). Make at least two methods:
>>> void registerNewObjects(List objects)
>>> void registerNewObjects(Object[] objects)
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jun 04 2008 - 10:27:48 EDT