On 06/04/2009, at 5:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Since we are not shipping JPA with 3.0, and further future of this
> line of development is undefined, we need to make some decisions
> now. I suggest doing what we did for DataViews - a separate location
> in SVN, and a separate wiki space. If this effort is revived (of
> which I have very strong doubts), we'll get it back to the main
> subtree.
What is the downside of just leaving it as is? The framework is nicely
separated as a separate maven/eclipse project, and moving the
documentation to be a second class citizen will only discourage anyone
else from working on it.
As it is, there is perhaps more chance of someone finding it
interesting and working on it, although the hurdles of signing the
NDA, etc make that less likely.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 04:49:27 EDT