Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Fri May 22 2009 - 07:16:40 EDT

  • Next message: Tore Halset: "Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6"

    There's no rush to finish the vote, and there seem to be a consensus
    forming that the trunk code that became M6 is good enough for the
    release. Still we need at least 3 formal votes to approve it.

    (yeah, and let me add my +1, now that I poked around the M6 Modeler
    for a couple of days).

    Andrus

    On May 20, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

    > It'll be Thursday at the earliest before I can examine the artifacts.
    > I don't want to hold anything up, though. Most of the tests I run
    > through are Cayenne Classic types and that stuff hasn't really
    > changed, so I probably wouldn't be testing the new stuff, anyway. At
    > the moment, I'm +0 -- please go ahead if everyone else agrees.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > mrg



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri May 22 2009 - 07:17:17 EDT