Re: Run query NOT in transaction

From: Robert Zeigler (robert.zeigle..oxanemy.com)
Date: Wed Oct 28 2009 - 11:02:36 EDT

  • Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne release 3.0B1"

    I've used explicit transactions 1x, for a very specific use-case that
    required raw sql updates and selects for performance reasons.
    So I would say for me, that makes it about 99.9999% that I use
    implicit transactions.

    Robert

    On Oct 28, 2009, at 10/288:45 AM , Mike Kienenberger wrote:

    > I've never used anything but implicit transaction management. I never
    > knew there was such a thing until the last couple of years :)
    >
    > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Michael Gentry
    > <mgentr..asslight.net> wrote:
    >> For me, and probably every other developer here, it would be > 99%
    >> of the
    >> time...
    >>
    >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org
    >> >wrote:
    >>
    >>> I disagree with the general statement. Implicit transaction
    >>> mechanism is
    >>> actually the best part of Cayenne 99% of the time compared to
    >>> alternatives.
    >>> I.e. you don't have to manage transaction at all.
    >>>
    >>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Oct 28 2009 - 11:34:30 EDT