On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> I've always thought of EJBQL as of sort of OOP-analogue of SQL. So
> while
> those thinks look logical and work in SQL, why shouldn't they in
> EJBQL..
> So I'm not fully convinced, but if you wish (?), I'll revert that
> change
Thanks for doing that. The way I see the EJBQL evolution in Cayenne is
that in 3.0 it is String-only, JPA-compatible. In 3.1+ it becomes an
API or String-based (CQL extends EJBQL), JPA compatible, but with
Cayenne extensions.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Jan 22 2010 - 03:08:38 EST