Great. We'll take another look at CAT-1367 on Monday.
Andrus
On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> OK, now with 1371 behind, I'm +1 to release and fix 1367 later
> (right now
> have no more time)
>
> 2010/1/22 Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>
>> Will try to on the weekend - but I cannot promise... Actually
>> CAY-1371 is
>>> a
>>> major bug and is must-have for 3.0. As for CAY-1367, I've already
>>> looked
>>> at
>>> it, fix will not be easy, but we'll just need to leave one primary
>>> field
>>> from an entity in FROM statement if it exists in group by. IMO we
>>> need to
>>> fix 1371, and RC2 can be built without 1367 as it is rather rare
>>> case and
>>> can be workarounded (by not specifying group-by path in FROM
>>> statement)
>>>
>>
>> Somehow overlooked CAY-1371. Definitely need to fix it.
>>
>>
>> Looking forward for fetch joins! :)
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, that one is important.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Jan 24 2010 - 08:19:26 EST