Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009...

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Tue Feb 09 2010 - 07:23:43 EST

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."

Previous message: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
In reply to: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:

> I've reverted CAY-1009 and reproduced problem in one of my projects.
> It's
> exactly as in Kevin's scenario. Correcting my case, there's
> relationship
> between B and C, not A and C.

I'll try to take a look at it tonight.

> Could you upload your patch in svn format? I'm afraid I don't have git

AFAIK it should still be compatible with patch command and hopefully
Eclipse (??). It has some extra headers that are simply ignored when
patching.

Andrus

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
Previous message: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
In reply to: Andrey Razumovsky: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
Next in thread: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: CAY-1378, CAY-1009..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 09 2010 - 07:24:19 EST