On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I'd caution that the change is going to break things for existing
> users. I left the patch as is for peer review and then users reported
> on the list that it worked in their scenarios. Reverting that is
> undoubtedly going to break code they already have working and it's
> going to do so in an RC. So it seems to me like we're just trading
> off solving one problem for another.
If we correctly identified the scenario, the fix for the users would
be to map their relationships correctly. I was going to add a note to
the docs to that extent.
Andrus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Feb 10 2010 - 16:34:06 EST