Re: [VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded

• Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "[VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded"
• In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "[VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded"
• Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: [VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 26/08/10 5:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.

Given the previous discussion, I am unclear about what the PMC's consensus is about what we are voting on. I posted an email about this a few days ago... are others in agreement with the general ideas in that?

If PMC decides that each voter needs to verify that the source code is properly licensed and matches the svn repository, then I don't know how to do that.

Regards

Ari

-- 
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

• Next message: Aristedes Maniatis: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-doc #134"
• Previous message: Andrus Adamchik: "[VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded"
• In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "[VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded"
• Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: [VOTE] 3.0.1 - reloaded"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Aug 26 2010 - 07:51:10 UTC