I am fine either way. Just wanted to point out that we probably don't care about the issues with JPA tests at all.
On Oct 14, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 13/10/10 6:58 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Hmm, wonder if we should svn cp branches/STABLE-3.0/ branches/STABLE-3.0_with_jpa/ and then remove JPA stuff from 3.0. Will make the builds faster for one thing.
> I don't think that is necessary. Hudson can be a bit inconsistent if builds happen on a new slave, but it is still useful to know about possible issues rather than mask them by removing the tests.
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 14 2010 - 11:15:40 UTC