Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-trunk » h2,JDK 1.5 (latest),Ubuntu #372

From: Michael Gentry (mgentr..asslight.net)
Date: Thu Oct 21 2010 - 14:36:15 UTC

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: Cayenne-trunk » h2,JDK 1.5 (latest),Ubuntu #372"

    Dare we switch? :-)

    On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Andrus Adamchik
    <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    > Nice!
    >
    > On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >
    >> FWIW, the H2 people fixed the bug for us and 3.1 builds and the tests
    >> successfully run with with H2 1.2.144.
    >>
    >> mrg
    >>
    >>
    >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Michael Gentry <mgentr..asslight.net> wrote:
    >>> Sure, I'll take care of that.  I also filed a bug for the H2 people.
    >>> Maybe they'll fix it, but at least we are back to building now.
    >>>
    >>> mrg
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>> Awesome. It worked.
    >>>>
    >>>> Can we possibly log a Jira about H2 auto increment feature and record it in RELEASE-NOTES? It should help us down the line in documenting 3.1 improvements.
    >>>>
    >>>> Andrus
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> H2 1.1.119 ran tests successfully locally, so I've committed the POM
    >>>>> and hopefully Hudson will build cleanly now.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> mrg
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>>>>> I suggest filing a bug with H2 and downgrading down, until we (hopefully) find a version that is free of that bug but still supports auto-increment. If that doesn't work, we can switch tests to file-based URLs.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Andrus
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>>>>>> Hi,
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I just did an experiment.  Using H2 against a file (/tmp/CayenneTest)
    >>>>>>> it worked fine (returned one record).  Against an in memory DB it
    >>>>>>> failed (returned 3 records).  Seems like there is a bug in H2
    >>>>>>> somewhere.  Thoughts on how we should handle this?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> mrg
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> PS. Here is the SQL:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> CREATE TABLE ARTIST (ARTIST_ID BIGINT NOT NULL, ARTIST_NAME CHAR(254)
    >>>>>>> NOT NULL, DATE_OF_BIRTH DATE NULL, PRIMARY KEY (ARTIST_ID));
    >>>>>>> CREATE TABLE PAINTING (ARTIST_ID BIGINT NULL, ESTIMATED_PRICE
    >>>>>>> DECIMAL(10, 2) NULL, GALLERY_ID INTEGER NULL, PAINTING_DESCRIPTION
    >>>>>>> VARCHAR(255) NULL, PAINTING_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, PAINTING_TITLE
    >>>>>>> VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (PAINTING_ID));
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> INSERT INTO ARTIST (ARTIST_ID, ARTIST_NAME) VALUES (33001, 'B');
    >>>>>>> INSERT INTO ARTIST (ARTIST_ID, ARTIST_NAME) VALUES (33002, 'A');
    >>>>>>> INSERT INTO ARTIST (ARTIST_ID, ARTIST_NAME) VALUES (33003, 'D');
    >>>>>>> INSERT INTO PAINTING (PAINTING_ID, ARTIST_ID, PAINTING_TITLE,
    >>>>>>> ESTIMATED_PRICE) VALUES (33009, 33001, 'X', 5000);
    >>>>>>> INSERT INTO PAINTING (PAINTING_ID, ARTIST_ID, PAINTING_TITLE,
    >>>>>>> ESTIMATED_PRICE) VALUES (33010, 33001, 'Y', 5000);
    >>>>>>> INSERT INTO PAINTING (PAINTING_ID, ARTIST_ID, PAINTING_TITLE,
    >>>>>>> ESTIMATED_PRICE) VALUES (33011, 33002, 'Z', 5000);
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> SELECT t0.DATE_OF_BIRTH AS ec0_0, t0.ARTIST_ID AS ec0_2,
    >>>>>>> t0.ARTIST_NAME AS ec0_1 FROM ARTIST t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN PAINTING t1 ON
    >>>>>>> (t0.ARTIST_ID = t1.ARTIST_ID) WHERE t1.PAINTING_ID IS NULL;
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Oct 21 2010 - 14:37:04 UTC