Re: 1:n deletion problem

From: Craig Miskell (cmiskel..lbatross.co.nz)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 18:28:12 EST

  • Next message: Fan, Bill (AP - Australia): "RE: 1:n deletion problem"

    Sorry, yes you could do that. I thought it along the way, but got
    caught up in evangelizing the delete rules. Figured 1 line is better
    than 3, but perhaps not! :-)

    Sorry
    Craig
    On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:22, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    > Craig, Bill,
    >
    > I think there is a solution that does not involve the nightly build (Or am
    > I missing something in this discussion?). Simply delete an object after
    > unsetting relationship:
    >
    > for(int i=0; i<projectuserss.size(); i++) {
    > Projectuser obj = (Projectusers)projectuserss.get(i);
    > user.removeFromProjectusersArray(obj);
    >
    > // !!! This Line Is Added
    > ctxt.deleteObject(obj);
    > }
    > ctxt.commitChanges(Level.WARN);
    >
    >
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    > > Easy. Simply removing the projectuser from the user will not trigger
    > > deletion. The behaviour you are seeing is quite correct (you may be
    > > used to WebOBjects/EOF, where such relationships can be set up (Owns
    > > destination) such that removing does delete the destination object.
    > > Cayenne doesn't have that (yet... don't know if it will, we'll have to
    > > discuss that on the dev list).
    > >
    > > Now to the solution:
    > > You say you're using release alpha-5-1. If you open the model in
    > > CayenneModeller, you may notice that the ObjRelationships have an
    > > additional column on the right of their specification, titled "Delete
    > > rule". In a5-1, the actual implementation of that is disabled (some
    > > bugs that mucked up constraints ... tested initially on mysql, committed
    > > to cvs, then discovered it failed on Oracle which actually has
    > > constraints. Bah humbug).
    > >
    > > If you get the nightly build, the implementation has been sorted out.
    > > So, what you'd do is set the relationship from ProjectUser to User to be
    > > Nullify (actually, that's the default). Then, your for loop would look
    > > like this (parentheses might be wrong):
    > >
    > > for (int i=0; i<projectuserss.size(); i++) {
    > > ctxt.deleteObject(((Projectusers)projectuserss.get(i)));
    > > }
    > >
    > > The delete rule is fired when you delete the ProjectUser. It looks at
    > > all of the relationships from ProjectUser to other ObjEntities. For
    > > nullify, it looks at the reverse relationship (user projectusersArray in
    > > this case). If it's toOne, it is set to null. If to-Many (your case),
    > > the object being deleted will be removed from that relationship. If
    > > there is no reverse relationship, nothing happens. The other rules are
    > > Cascade (if you set this relationship to cascade, the User would be
    > > deleted) and Deny, which throws an exception when you try to delete if
    > > the destination has any objects.
    > >
    > > Let me know if you need more help on this.. I'm planning on writing
    > > docos on it, but haven't yet had the time (actually, more like "not had
    > > the inclination", but lack of time sounds better :-))
    > >
    > > Craig Miskell
    > >
    > >
    > > On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:27, Fan, Bill (AP - Australia) wrote:
    > >> Hi All,
    > >>
    > >> I'm having problem to use the X.removeFromYArray(y) function to delete
    > >> the 1:n relationship records in the database. I'm using tomcat 4.1.17
    > >> + Struts 1.1 + Cayenne-1.0a5-1.
    > >>
    > >> It is a project issue management system. There are 4 tables in the
    > >> user management section - Project, Users, Role & ProjectUsers. The
    > >> tables are defined as following (in brief):
    > >>
    > >> Project:
    > >> ProjectId int PK
    > >> ProjectName varchar(100)
    > >>
    > >> Users: (oops, can't use User in MSSQL, don't get confused below... )
    > >> UserId int PK
    > >> Login varchar(50)
    > >> Password varchar(20)
    > >>
    > >> Role:
    > >> RoleId int PK
    > >> RoleDesc varchar(50)
    > >>
    > >> ProjectUsers:
    > >> ProjectId int FK
    > >> UserId int FK
    > >> RoleId int FK
    > >>
    > >> ProjectUsers table holds all the information how the user can access
    > >> the system. When I come to the section to edit/modify the user roles,
    > >> I need to delete the records in this table for a user related to a
    > >> particular project, then add the new ones. The logic related to the
    > >> deletion process is as following:
    > >>
    > >> // 1. get the user object
    > >> Users users = getUsers(ctxt, login);
    > >>
    > >> // 2. get the all related projectuser objects(regardless what
    > >> project for now)
    > >> List projectuserss = user.getProjectusersArray();
    > >>
    > >> // 3. iterating through the projectusers list and remove them: for
    > >> (int i=0; i<projectuserss.size(); i++)
    > >>
    > >> user.removeFromProjectusersArray((Projectusers)projectuserss.get(i));
    > >>
    > >> // 4. finally, commit the changes
    > >> ctxt.commitChanges(Level.WARN);
    > >>
    > >> No matter what I did, just can't see the DELETE statement generated by
    > >> Cayenne from the tomcat running console, and the database records are
    > >> not removed obviously.
    > >>
    > >> The users object and the related projectuserss list returned by the
    > >> statements can be verified they are all correct. I've tried to set the
    > >> users object consistence state by using
    > >> users.setPersistenceState(PersistenceStte.MODIFIED) right after I get
    > >> the users object, eventhough it is not the case in the
    > >> RemovePaintingFroGalleryAction example.
    > >>
    > >> On the other hand, the users.addToProjectusersArray(projectusers)
    > >> function is working perfectly (I've added lot of duplicated records ;-
    > >> )
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> What I'm doing wrong here? Can anyone point me to the right direction?
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> Thanks for your help!
    > >>
    > >> Bill
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jan 14 2003 - 18:24:54 EST