Yeah, that's right. But against me, there's a new developer at my job
that spend 2 weeks trying to use cayenne without success. I still
think it was something wrong with his setup, but at the time I did not
had the time to find out the problem. Anyway, he is someone that is
against cayenne's easy-to-use argument. That's why I was seeking a
succes story of some kind, mainly because Hibernate is far more
popular here in Brasil...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:09:16 +0200, Twan Kogels <twa..wansoft.com> wrote:
> Joćo,
>
> Maybe another advantage: cayenne is easy to learn, not only for yourself.
> When working in a team you can easy explain cayenne basics to the junior
> team members and the modeler visualize things a bit, so your team members
> get more exited and learn faster.
>
> Twan Kogels
>
>
>
> At 22:02 21-9-2004, you wrote:
> >My manager asked me to suggest some frameworks and solutions to define
> >the standard environment here at my work. I will defend cayenne +
> >tapestry (thanks to Steve) and was wondering if, besides the modeler
> >gui, the more familiar (to me) approach with DataContext and the
> >outdated hibernate docs, cayenne has other edges when compared with
> >other ORM frameworks. If anyone has a link to some kind of
> >comparision, please post. I have read some articles already, but I was
> >interested in something like "I was a hibernate user and shitched to
> >cayenne because of .......".
> >
> >Thanks for your time,
> >--
> >Joćo Paulo Vasconcellos
> >ICQ: 123-953-864
>
>
-- Joćo Paulo Vasconcellos ICQ: 123-953-864
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 21 2004 - 22:50:30 EDT