RE: double-clicking and DataContexts bound to the HttpSession

From: Laszlo Spoor (lspoor_cayenn..otmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2005 - 15:18:10 EST

  • Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: double-clicking and DataContexts bound to the HttpSession"

    Would it be an option if you create a Collection of 'pending users' in the
    ServletContext? If a user submits a request, you can add him to the pending
    collection. If the email is sent, you can clear the user from that list.
    This way you don't have to do any tricky stuff...

    >From: Mike Kienenberger <mkienen..laska.net>
    >Reply-To: cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org
    >To: cayenne-use..bjectstyle.org
    >Subject: double-clicking and DataContexts bound to the HttpSession
    >Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:04:40 -0500
    >
    >I just had a non-fun event.
    >
    >One of our web users resubmitted a form while applying for an account.
    >
    >What happened was that the first submit paused 30 seconds while sending out
    >an email message.
    >I send out an activation message before I commit a new account creation.
    >However, the impatient user clicked submit again after 10 seconds, starting
    >the process a second time.
    >
    >So the 2nd request goes through, adds a second user object (along with
    >second copies other garbage) to the context, sends the email without
    >incident (obviously it was a temporary network timeout on the first
    >request), then commits both the first and second set of each object.
    >
    >Then the first request recovers, and commits, but now has an empty
    >DataContext.
    >
    >So now I'm trying to decide how to handle this.
    >
    >I can check in my getDefaultContext() if the DataContext is dirty and then
    >return a new DataContext, but that doesn't really solve the problem. In
    >that case, the 2nd request would have still created a second copy of the
    >objects and commited only the second copy, and the first request would have
    >still committed the first copy, so I'd still end up in the same situation.
    >
    >I can probably deal with this specific problem by detecting a double-click
    >event and handling it differently.
    >
    >However, I'm now a little paranoid about sharing a DataContext within the
    >same HttpSession. It never occurred to me before that two threads might
    >be
    >operating on the same HttpSession DataContext at the same time. Am I
    >overlooking something?
    >
    >Do I need to somehow lock my DataContext on session request receive and
    >unlock it on session response send? This is sounding depressingly like
    >WebObjects 5.0/5.1 without the added safety of serialized access.
    >
    >Or maybe I just need to force all access to a session DataContext to be
    >serialized.
    >
    >-Mike

    _________________________________________________________________
    FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
    http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Feb 17 2005 - 15:19:11 EST