Re: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ...

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Wed Jul 13 2005 - 17:27:06 EDT

Next message: Joshua Pyle: "Re: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."

Previous message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
In reply to: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Next in thread: Joshua Pyle: "Re: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Next in thread: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Gentry, Michael (Contractor)" <michael_gentr..anniemae.com> wrote:
> I don't think addClassPath would work since it would append to the
> CLASSPATH and my cayenne.xml #2 is already in the CLASSPATH, it is just
> overshadowed by #1.

You're right. I wasn't thinking clearly.

You can change the name it looks for. First optional parameter for
Configuration. I use it to guarantee that my unit tests never access my
non-unit-test datasources.

new DefaultConfiguration("cayenne-testing.xml")

Next message: Joshua Pyle: "Re: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Previous message: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
In reply to: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Next in thread: Joshua Pyle: "Re: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Next in thread: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\): "RE: Interesting Tomcat (et al) Issue ..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed Jul 13 2005 - 17:24:01 EDT