There's some sketchy documentation of this issue:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2002-06/msg00088.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-08/msg00098.php
However, the JDBC driver project is run in a bit of a vacuum, so its hard to
say if any good would come from telling them. Most likely, we'll have to
submit a patch to them, or workaround in Cayenne.
Cris
On 3/10/06, Tomi NA <hefes..mail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/9/06, Cris Daniluk <cris.danilu..mail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've reported this a few times and been told by Andrus its probably
> > the driver's fault. While I tend to agree, I've never taken the time
> > and energy to verify that it is the driver, and why.
> >
> > I've had the problem on 8.0 and 7.4 as well. In fact, it tends to only
> > happen on the subsequent revers engineers (the initial one works
> > fine). I will try to spend some time tracking this down tomorrow and
> > Saturday... while its probably a JDBC driver problem, there may be a
> > Cayenne solution.
> >
>
> I've just run a test: I made a new cayenne project, did a fresh db
> reengineer and got the same result I got before: no relations.
> I'm interested to see what you come up with till next week...Do you think
> this might be worth mentioning on a postgresql mailing list?
>
> Tomislav
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 10 2006 - 13:12:52 EST