Re: inDbExp but no notInDbExp

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..mail.com)
Date: Wed May 03 2006 - 13:57:02 EDT

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Querying join table"

Previous message: Fredrik Liden: "inDbExp but no notInDbExp"
In reply to: Fredrik Liden: "Querying join table"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Querying join table"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 5/3/06, Fredrik Liden <flide..ranslate.com> wrote:
> There is an inExp(Collection) and notInExp(collection)
> Then there is the inDbExp(Collection) but no notInDbExp.
>
> Is there any way I can formulate a notInDbExp using the existing
> methods?

Sure. These are all convenience wrapper methods, so you can simply
compare the differences between the implementation of inExp and
notInExp and extrapolate them from inDbExp to a nonInDbExp.

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Querying join table"
Previous message: Fredrik Liden: "inDbExp but no notInDbExp"
In reply to: Fredrik Liden: "Querying join table"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: Querying join table"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Wed May 03 2006 - 13:57:32 EDT