AW: performing count

From: Peter Schröder (Peter.Schroede..reenet-ag.de)
Date: Tue Jun 05 2007 - 09:45:33 EDT

  • Next message: Lachlan Deck: "Re: weird problems with context"

    first of all: thank u very much for the fast support

    where do we put it? as a user of cayenne, i dont really care. as long as it is well documented!

    kind regards
    peter

    -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
    Von: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andru..bjectstyle.org]
    Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 15:42
    An: use..ayenne.apache.org
    Betreff: Re: performing count

    So where do we put it then? QueryUtils?

    Andrus

    On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

    > I don't see a reason to dump it into DataObjectUtils since we don't
    > have
    > to. :-) I was thinking about something in CayenneDataObject, but
    > that
    > doesn't seem quite right, either for the same reasoning (although
    > might be
    > more convenient on users).
    >
    > As to not having a fetch method in a query class, I'm fine with
    > that. I was
    > asking for opinions, after all.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > /dev/mrg
    >
    >
    > On 6/4/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
    >>
    >> > Putting it in DataObjectUtils doesn't seem the right place to me.
    >> > Using your example:
    >> >
    >> > DataObjectUtils.objectForQuery(...)
    >> >
    >> > returns a DataObject (which makes sense to me, being packaged in
    >> > DataObjectUtils). Something that returns an int, which can't
    >> even be
    >> > converted into a DataObject, doesn't feel like it should be in
    >> > DataObjectUtils.
    >>
    >>
    >> I agree that DataObjectUtils becoming a kitchen sink is bad, and
    >> "DataObjectUtils" name is a bit obsolete anyways, considering that
    >> "Persistent" is the interface Cayenne stack is dealing with. So
    >> DataObjectUtils class itself needs some redesign (split QueryUtils
    >> out of it or something?)
    >>
    >> My other point about not adding fetch methods to the query classes is
    >> still valid though. So we can either push for DataObjectUtils
    >> redesign now, or use it as a kitchen sink one more time :-)
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Jun 05 2007 - 09:45:34 EDT