Re: [C3] logging

From: Michael Gentry (blacknex..mail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:46:27 EDT

Next message: Gilberto C Andrade: "Re: [POLL]: Cayenne 3.0 -- Java 1.4 or 5 support?"

Previous message: Michael Gentry: "Re: [C3] logging"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [C3] logging"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I thought that part was amusing. I have no vested interest in any
logging decision. I was rather happy with printf() in my C code. :-)
However, after seeing errors in logs in legacy code I had to maintain
which said "An error has occurred" and no context provided, I do know
the benefits of good logging.

/dev/mrg

On 9/14/07, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Yeah... "It does things right: Logger, not Log." That's an
> improvement! :-)
>
> Andrus

Next message: Gilberto C Andrade: "Re: [POLL]: Cayenne 3.0 -- Java 1.4 or 5 support?"
Previous message: Michael Gentry: "Re: [C3] logging"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: [C3] logging"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 14 2007 - 10:02:23 EDT