Re: Basic ROP questions

From: Kevin Menard (kmenar..ervprise.com)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 16:16:29 EDT

  • Next message: Kevin Menard: "Re: Basic ROP questions"

    Answering my first question . . . That's a definite no. The parent class
    implementations are quite different. So, I may just have to break down and
    create utility classes that accept DOs as arguments. A bit of pain, but
    it'll reduce the code duplication.

    -- 
    Kevin
    

    On 9/14/07 1:09 PM, "Kevin Menard" <kmenar..ervprise.com> wrote:

    > I'm just getting started on a ROP project using Cayenne 3.0. In my server > classes, I had a large amount of utility methods attached to my DOs. > Clearly, there's a fair amount of overlap between the server classes and the > client classes. > > A couple brief questions then follow: > > 1) Will modifying the Velocity template to subclass the servers classes help > reduce the code duplication? Will this even work? > > 2) Will packaging either the server or the client classes into distributable > JARs gain me anything? > > I'll try these out on my own anyway, but before I got too bogged down with > that, I just wanted to see what's doable and what's not. I haven't looked > into the finer details of relationships between the server and client > classes. > > Thanks, > Kevin >

    --



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 14 2007 - 16:17:10 EDT